“Mediapart révèle que la start-up française a utilisé des œuvres protégées par le droit d’auteur pour entraîner son modèle d’intelligence artificielle. L’entreprise peut aussi piller, malgré les interdictions, des données disponibles en ligne. Par exemple celles de médias, dont Mediapart.”
“ We, the participants from countries and international organizations, gathered in New Delhi on 19 February 2026 to hold the AI Impact Summit. The advent of AI marks an inflection point in the trajectory of technological evolution. The choices that we make today will shape the AI-enabled world that future generations will inherit.
This calls for further international cooperation and multistakeholder engagement across our countries along the seven Chakras (pillars) of the AI Impact Summit centred around the principles of :
– development of human capital;
– broadening access for social empowerment;
– trustworthiness of AI systems;
– energy efficiency of AI systems;
– use of AI in science;
– democratizing AI resources;
– use of AI for economic growth and social good”.
Source : AI Impact Summit Declaration, New Delhi (February 18 – 19, 2026)
“Even if the flawed prompt is to blame, the chatbots’ answers starkly contrast with their developers’ claims that human-level AI will be built in the next decade or sooner. The widespread failure across models also raises doubts about the AI’s ability to fully automate jobs.”
Source : AI models fails the viral car wash test | Cybernews
“The Mexican city of Guadalupe, which will host portions of the 2026 World Cup, recently showed off four new robot dogs that will help provide security during matches at BBVA Stadium.
The robot dogs are just one part of Guadalupe’s security strategy for the 2026 World Cup. The city also plans to use advanced surveillance drones and anti-drone technology to protect large events. The authorities have not disclosed the model, manufacturer, or many technical details of the K9-X units.”
Source : Robot Dogs Are on Going on Patrol at the 2026 World Cup in Mexico | WIRED
“We’re publishing a new constitution for our AI model, Claude. It’s a detailed description of Anthropic’s vision for Claude’s values and behavior; a holistic document that explains the context in which Claude operates and the kind of entity we would like Claude to be. The constitution is a crucial part of our model training process, and its content directly shapes Claude’s behavior. Training models is a difficult task, and Claude’s outputs might not always adhere to the constitution’s ideals. But we think that the way the new constitution is written—with a thorough explanation of our intentions and the reasons behind them—makes it more likely to cultivate good values during training. In this post, we describe what we’ve included in the new constitution and some of the considerations that informed our approach. We’re releasing Claude’s constitution in full under a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Deed, meaning it can be freely used by anyone for any purpose without asking for permission.”
“Photos remind us of the people we love — family far away, moments long gone, voices we can’t hear anymore. Our homes are full of smart devices, but none of that bring warmth, presence, or connection.”
Source : Vinabot
“L’IA consomme beaucoup d’énergie et chez Infomaniak, rien n’est perdu. La chaleur produite par Euria est entièrement récupérée et réinjectée dans le chauffage urbain de Genève. Euria démontre qu’une IA peut être puissante tout en étant plus soutenable pour la planète : 100% alimentée par des énergies renouvelables, sans eau gaspillée, toute l’énergie profite une seconde fois à la collectivité pour chauffer des foyers. Boris Siegenthaler, fondateur d’Infomaniak. Concrètement, le data center qui propulse Euria permet, à pleine capacité, de chauffer jusqu’à 6 000 logements en hiver, de fournir 20 000 douches chaudes par jour et d’éviter la combustion de 3 600 tonnes de CO₂ issus du gaz naturel par an.”
Source : Euria : l’assistant IA souverain et gratuit pour ne plus dépendre des géants américains • Infomaniak
“Globalement, Grok est non seulement le modèle génératif le plus prompt à produire des textes et des recommandations climatosceptiques, mais également des résultats incitant les internautes à critiquer tout ce qui touche à la protection de l’environnement en ligne, suggérant notamment l’usage du hashtag #ClimateScam (arnaque climatique), ou poussant les usages à produire des médias taillés pour la viralité. Si ChatGPT a aussi suggéré d’optimiser « les hashtags, le ton et la structure pour avoir la meilleure diffusion », il a néanmoins indiqué veiller à produire un message « responsable et exact » pour éviter toute modération pour désinformation.”
Source : Les chatbots d’IA alimentent-ils le climatoscepticisme ? Grok plutôt oui, Meta AI pas tant – Next
“GenAI.mil, recently launched as the War Department’s bespoke AI platform, will soon be expanded with the addition of xAI for Government’s suite of frontier‑grade capabilities. Today, the War Department officially entered into an agreement with xAI, paving the way for the deployment of its advanced capabilities on GenAI.mil. This move builds on the rapid deployment of cutting‑edge AI across the Department’s 3 million military and civilian personnel.This initiative will soon embed xAI’s frontier AI systems, based on the Grok family of models, directly into GenAI.mil. Targeted for initial deployment in early 2026, this integration will allow all military and civilian personnel to use xAI’s capabilities at Impact Level 5 (IL5), enabling the secure handling of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in daily workflows. Users will also gain access to real‑time global insights from the X platform, providing War Department personnel with a decisive information advantage.”
“At most scientific publications, papers co-authored by artificial intelligence (AI) are not welcome. At a new open platform called aiXiv, they are embraced. The platform goes all in on AI: It accepts both AI- and human-authored work, uses built-in AI reviewers for baseline quality screening, and guides authors through revisions based on the chatbots’ feedback. “AI-generated knowledge shouldn’t be treated differently,” says Guowei Huang, one of aiXiv’s creators and a Ph.D. candidate specializing in AI and business at the University of Manchester. “We should only care about quality—not who produced it.”The platform is still at an early stage; after a mid-November update, it hosts just a few dozen papers and early-stage proposals. But many researchers say it promises a welcome reprieve for the overloaded human peer-review system, which has been forced to shoulder the ongoing surge of papers driven by both legitimate and banned use of AI. “It’s extremely important that the automated science community take responsibility for how they are going to evaluate their own research,” says Thomas Dietterich, an emeritus professor of computer science at Oregon State University.”
Source : A new preprint server welcomes papers written and reviewed by AI | Science | AAAS
© 2026 no-Flux
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑
